Sunnified! wrote:On that note,with the exception of OOTW (minus the chorus), the reparative nature is getting concerning. Personally, I think that when artists repeat things, whether it's in a chorus or a bridge, it's because they weren't able to come up with anything else and they're just like "meh, just hit repeat" SIO, WTNY, and OOTW are all quite repetitive.
Sunnified! wrote:I also like the fact that we can all come here and state our own opinions without being criticized for it. If you read some of the comments and replies on TC, you'd think they have a verbal stoning station set up.
I agree, it doesn't fit like it does in OOTW.nm4dancingbut4uidid wrote:I do find the repetitive natural of W2NY really annoying. I just not that into the song as a whole either, I guess. The repeating didn't bother me as much in OOTW or SIO. I'm just scared that every song on the album is going to be really repetitive. Like Taylor, what are you doing? All your fans know you can write a hell of a song without repeating the same line a zillion times .
Yeah, I definitely think it's the weakest on the album and it's my least favorite on 1989 too but I actually still do like it and I understand it's purpose as the album opener and the deeper meaning of how moving somewhere new can change you, I just like the rest of the album a lot better because it's just that great and I love it so much! And I agree that Shake it off is the second weakest. As much as I love it, it's just not as strong as the others and I'm always tempted to skip it because it just doesn't fit musically like the others do but I don't because I still love it despite that and I don't think the bonus songs could replace them or any of the others on the album because they tell a story and as great as the bonus songs are, they just wouldn't fit in with that. Wonderland because it would be a repeate of I know places story-wise, You are in love isn't part if her story and New Romantics although it could fit after Clean I think Clean was a better song to end on because New Romantics is almost like the start of a new story so it works as the end of the bonus songs with Clean being the end of the regular version so that they're both ending songs. So I understand why they're bonus songs even though I think they're really good and way better than her usual bonus songs.Kate wrote:I agree. I think W2NY is one of her weakest songs on 1989, however, it always makes me really excited and happy when I listen to it even though I don't like New York. For me, at least, it captures that sense of wonder when something is brand new to you. I think she made it the first track to excite everyone for the rest of the album.
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum